Summary
adopting federal definition of "interrogation" for the purposes of Article I, section 12
Summary of this case from State v. Montiel-DelvalleOpinion
July 2, 2002
July 2, 2002
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 2, 2002
334 Or. 327 (Or. 2002)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 2, 2002
334 Or. 327 (Or. 2002)
adopting federal definition of "interrogation" for the purposes of Article I, section 12
Summary of this case from State v. Montiel-Delvallerejecting the state's assertion that a burglary and a robbery were not directed at the same criminal objective because earlier objective to steal victim's property continued during the course of events
Summary of this case from State v. Thornsberrydiscussing related issue
Summary of this case from State v. Swanobserving that, under ORS 215.130, a person is entitled to "continue a nonconforming use of land, so long as that use was lawful before a change in zoning made that use nonconforming"
Summary of this case from Waste Not of Yamhill Cnty. v. Yamhill Cnty.treating mootness as threshold issue
Summary of this case from Krisor v. Henrynoting that Oregon has adopted that definition of "interrogation" for purposes of Article I, section 12
Summary of this case from State v. Moellernoting that "the notation of previous disciplinary action on a student record can be sufficient to preserve" justiciability as a "black mark" on the petitioner's record but dismissing the case as moot because the records had been destroyed
Summary of this case from Blechschmidt v. Shatzerdefining interrogation for the purposes of Article I, section 12
Summary of this case from State v. McMillanCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jul 2, 2002
Citations
334 Or. 327 (Or. 2002)
Citing Cases
State v. Burns
State v. Kautz, 179 Or.App. 458, 467, 39 P.3d 937,rev. den.,334 Or. 327, 52 P.3d 435 (2002); accord…
Waste Not of Yamhill Cnty. v. Yamhill Cnty.Furthermore, the county and the trial court correctly concluded that the rezoning process did not "alter or…