Summary
interpreting James v. SAIF, supra; work must be "the major contributing cause"
Summary of this case from Maddox v. SaifOpinion
March 30, 1982.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 30, 1982
292 Or. 825 (Or. 1982)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 30, 1982
292 Or. 825 (Or. 1982)
interpreting James v. SAIF, supra; work must be "the major contributing cause"
Summary of this case from Maddox v. SaifCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Mar 30, 1982
Citations
292 Or. 825 (Or. 1982)
Citing Cases
Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.
And in all of the cases (except Young), the basis of the employer's belief was the same: Although…
Saif v. LuhrsShortly thereafter, Dr. Long diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in claimant's left wrist, and performed surgery…