From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 19, 1989
308 Or. 382 (Or. 1989)

Summary

holding that the trial court erred in not considering the husband's dental practice a marital asset, although it was also the source of money for the husband to pay spousal support

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Colton

Opinion

September 19, 1989.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 19, 1989
308 Or. 382 (Or. 1989)

holding that the trial court erred in not considering the husband's dental practice a marital asset, although it was also the source of money for the husband to pay spousal support

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Colton

rejecting argument that oral ruling could satisfy the requirement of ORCP 64 G and requiring that an order embodying ruling be entered

Summary of this case from State v. Lesley

involving a dental practice awarded to husband

Summary of this case from In re Johnson

addressing availability of mandamus where a trial court entered order granting new trial beyond time limitation prescribed in ORS 136.535

Summary of this case from State v. Lesley
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Sep 19, 1989

Citations

308 Or. 382 (Or. 1989)

Citing Cases

State v. Lopez-Loaiza

The failure of a defendant to execute a written waiver of jury trial, required by Article I, section 11, of…

State v. Veatch

Again, the point of requiring that the motion be made immediately is to allow the court to take prompt…