Summary
concluding that the amendment was intended to "federalize" summary judgment procedure
Summary of this case from Stoeger v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co.Opinion
1996.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1996
323 Or. 483 (Or. 1996)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1996
323 Or. 483 (Or. 1996)
concluding that the amendment was intended to "federalize" summary judgment procedure
Summary of this case from Stoeger v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co.rejecting rape defendant's MJOA on kidnapping count, after concluding that, “although the distance involved was only 10 to 12 feet, the victim was taken from one place [living room] to another [bathroom] within the meaning of ORS 163.225 ”
Summary of this case from State v. Washingtonexplaining that the courts "primarily consider whether the parties were aware of the purpose of the agreement and the nature and extent of the property affected by it, and whether the document was presented to the receiving party at a reasonable time before the wedding to allow that individual the opportunity to seek counsel and to review its terms"
Summary of this case from In the Matter of the Marriage of BridgeCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
Citations
323 Or. 483 (Or. 1996)
Citing Cases
Yager and Yager
"[w]e primarily consider whether the parties were aware of the purpose of the agreement and the nature and…
Workman v. Valley Ins. Co.Consequently, the trial court erred in allowing summary judgment. See generally Jones v. General Motors…