reversing suppression of evidence of residential marijuana growing operation because detailed information about the operation was not rendered “stale” by the passage of two months, but noting that “[t]he information was not about a quantity of marijuana that may be consumed or moved, but about a marijuana growing operation”
Summary of this case from State v. Ulizzi1993.
reversing suppression of evidence of residential marijuana growing operation because detailed information about the operation was not rendered “stale” by the passage of two months, but noting that “[t]he information was not about a quantity of marijuana that may be consumed or moved, but about a marijuana growing operation”
Summary of this case from State v. UlizziFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
In his sixth assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred when it excluded the testimony…
STATE v. ZERN90-11422; CA A68417On respondent's petition for reconsideration filed June 23, 1992 Petition for…