From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 554 (Or. 1998)

Summary

holding that the legislature's amendment of statutory provision that had been held to be impliedly repealed "has the effect of reviving and reenacting" the provision that had been impliedly repealed

Summary of this case from State v. Ferguson

Opinion

1998.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 554 (Or. 1998)

holding that the legislature's amendment of statutory provision that had been held to be impliedly repealed "has the effect of reviving and reenacting" the provision that had been impliedly repealed

Summary of this case from State v. Ferguson

holding that a briefcase and a coin purse are "typically used to store valuables" because, "when viewed objectively, [they] are containers in which a reasonable person could expect to find valuables"

Summary of this case from State v. Swanson

concluding that, even if trial court's denial of suppression motion was error, the error was harmless because challenged evidence had not been introduced in defendant's trial and had not led to derivative evidence

Summary of this case from State v. Gonzalez

concluding that the sellers of real property did not breach their implied duty of good faith and fair dealing by insisting that optionees under a right of first refusal comply with a provision contained in the prospective buyers' offer to purchase requiring that a residence be built on the property within a specified time period

Summary of this case from Flynn v. Hanna

recognizing that "ORS 163.195 was intended to cover potential risks as well as cases where a specific person is within the zone of danger," and affirming the defendant's conviction for reckless endangerment, where he shot a gun 15 times at the ceiling and front door of his lower-floor duplex in Portland at 10 p.m. on a Friday night without knowing whether anyone was upstairs or outside

Summary of this case from State v. Brown

describing holding in Morgan

Summary of this case from State v. Ambill

explaining why inventory issues generally should not be considered in the first instance on appeal.

Summary of this case from State v. Weems
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1998

Citations

327 Or. 554 (Or. 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. Cleland

In denying defendant's motion to suppress, the trial court concluded that the search of the case was…

Jones v. State

Criminal trial counsel did not object either to the entry of separate convictions on each of those counts or…