Summary
reviewing for errors of law whether conduct for which the defendant was held in contempt was part of the same criminal episode as that which led to later criminal charges
Summary of this case from State v. ForeOpinion
1994.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1994
318 Or. 326 (Or. 1994)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1994
318 Or. 326 (Or. 1994)
reviewing for errors of law whether conduct for which the defendant was held in contempt was part of the same criminal episode as that which led to later criminal charges
Summary of this case from State v. ForeCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
Citations
318 Or. 326 (Or. 1994)
Citing Cases
Yarbrough v. Viewcrest Invs., LLC
In contrast, we have determined that errors were judicial, and not clerical, when they reflected the…
State v. YoungWell-worn principles of statutory construction counsel us to avoid, if possible, interpretations that render…