Summary
concluding that no trespassing signs on an adjacent field were not indicative of defendant's intent, where a fence separated the field from the open driveway
Summary of this case from State v. HockemaOpinion
1993.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1993
318 Or. 171 (Or. 1993)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1993
318 Or. 171 (Or. 1993)
concluding that no trespassing signs on an adjacent field were not indicative of defendant's intent, where a fence separated the field from the open driveway
Summary of this case from State v. Hockemadiscussing this element
Summary of this case from State v. WilliamsCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Citations
318 Or. 171 (Or. 1993)
Citing Cases
State v. Williams
In short, the issue is not whether the handgun is within a person's control or direction, but whether the…
State v. WarnerHolmes, 311 Or at 409. Our decision in State v. Gilmore, 123 Or. App. 594, 860 P.2d 882, rev den 318 Or. 171…