holding that, in the absence of the qualifying circumstances that are described in ORS 215.780, the 80-acre minimum parcel size is an across-the-board requirement in EFU zones that applies to remaining parcels after any partition of land occurs
Summary of this case from Phillips v. Polk County1998.
holding that, in the absence of the qualifying circumstances that are described in ORS 215.780, the 80-acre minimum parcel size is an across-the-board requirement in EFU zones that applies to remaining parcels after any partition of land occurs
Summary of this case from Phillips v. Polk Countynoting that "there may have been an 'irregularity' in the proceedings in the sense that the trial court inadvertently did not follow its usual practice"
Summary of this case from McCollum v. Kmart Corp.Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
"administrative expressions of policy are offered as context, courts must be cautious not to make policy in…
Weyhrich v. LampertPetitioner directly appealed his convictions, but the Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court…