holding that, because the arbitrator ruled that there was no violation of the collective bargaining agreement, he acted beyond his authority in ordering a remedy
Summary of this case from Chenowith Ed. Assn. v. Chenowith School Dist. 9May 19, 1981.
holding that, because the arbitrator ruled that there was no violation of the collective bargaining agreement, he acted beyond his authority in ordering a remedy
Summary of this case from Chenowith Ed. Assn. v. Chenowith School Dist. 9Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: May 19, 1981
See Crosby v. SAIF, 73 Or. App. 372, 376, 699 P.2d 198 (1985), reaching the same conclusion under ORS…
Eugene Educ. Assoc. v. Eugene School Dist. 4JWe affirm. In Eugene Ed. Assoc. v. Eugene Sch. Dist. 4J, 50 Or. App. 191, 623 P.2d 657, rev den 291 Or. 9…