Summary
holding that the legislature has given a broad mandate to the board to prescribe procedural rules for the conduct of hearings
Summary of this case from Stores v. GodfreyOpinion
August 29, 1989.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Aug 29, 1989
308 Or. 315 (Or. 1989)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Aug 29, 1989
308 Or. 315 (Or. 1989)
holding that the legislature has given a broad mandate to the board to prescribe procedural rules for the conduct of hearings
Summary of this case from Stores v. Godfreyconcluding that evidence of 12 bags of methamphetamine, seven balloons of heroin, scales, a police scanner, razor blades, cash, and drug records was sufficient
Summary of this case from State v. Newstedinvolving possession of 12 bags of methamphetamine, seven balloons of heroin, scales, a police scanner, razor blades, cash, and drug records
Summary of this case from State v. Alvarez-GarciaCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Aug 29, 1989
Citations
308 Or. 315 (Or. 1989)
Citing Cases
State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Smith
We have held that, when there are circumstances that establish that, because one child has been molested,…
In re N. E. C. v. A. L. MIt is axiomatic that a juvenile court may not continue a wardship "if the jurisdictional facts on which it is…