holding that the question of whether the defendant was seized need not be reached because the evidence the defendant sought to suppress was not the product of exploitation of the alleged unlawful seizure
Summary of this case from State v. Herrera-Sorrosa1997.
holding that the question of whether the defendant was seized need not be reached because the evidence the defendant sought to suppress was not the product of exploitation of the alleged unlawful seizure
Summary of this case from State v. Herrera-Sorrosaaffirming in part and reversing and remanding in part judgment following second trial in declaratory judgment proceeding
Summary of this case from Goddard v. Farmers Ins. Co.reasoning that the application of the insurance policy's terms to particular historical circumstances is a question of fact
Summary of this case from Hunters Ridge Condo. Ass'n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLCexposing an employee to the certainty of injury is not enough to state a claim under ORS 656.156 ; the employee must show that the employer possessed, at least in part, a motive to injure
Summary of this case from Bundy v. Nustar GP, LLCobserving that, in reviewing the trial court's grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under ORCP 21 A, appellate court accepts as true all well-pleaded factual allegations and gives the plaintiff the benefit of all favorable inferences that may be drawn from the facts alleged
Summary of this case from Guirma v. O'Briennoting that, where the petitioner did not challenge the agency's authority to promulgate the governing rules, the procedures followed when making the rules, or the validity of the rules under Oregon law, the court did not address those issues
Summary of this case from Smith v. Public Emp. Retirement Bd.Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
To demonstrate "deliberate intent" under ORS 656.156 (2), the employee must prove that: (1) the employer's…
Yanney v. KoehlerArgued and submitted June 24, 1996.Affirmed March 26, petition for review denied May 20, 1997 ( 325 Or. 368).…