reversing and remanding PUC decision because “[t]he generalgrants of authority in ORS 756.040 and other general statutes do not empower PGE to charge or PUC to approve rates of a kind that are specifically contrary to the limitations in ORS 757.355 and ORS 757.140”
Summary of this case from Chang v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Or.November 19, 2002
November 20, 2002
reversing and remanding PUC decision because “[t]he generalgrants of authority in ORS 756.040 and other general statutes do not empower PGE to charge or PUC to approve rates of a kind that are specifically contrary to the limitations in ORS 757.355 and ORS 757.140”
Summary of this case from Chang v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Or.Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Nov 20, 2002
Kurtz, 350 Or at 72 n 5 (citing Solem v. Bartlett, 465 US 463, 465 n 2, 104 S Ct 1161, 79 L Ed 2d 443…
Gearhart v. Public Utility Commission of OregonNAKAMOTO, J.As a result of one Supreme Court opinion, Dreyer v. PGE, 341 Or. 262, 278–79, 142 P.3d 1010…