Summary
interpreting the "operator must make certain" language of former OAR 257-30-020(b) which also required a 15-minute pretest observation period
Summary of this case from State v. TynonOpinion
1996.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1996
324 Or. 305 (Or. 1996)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1996
324 Or. 305 (Or. 1996)
interpreting the "operator must make certain" language of former OAR 257-30-020(b) which also required a 15-minute pretest observation period
Summary of this case from State v. TynonCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
Citations
324 Or. 305 (Or. 1996)
Citing Cases
State v. Tynon
Our standard of review regarding a trial court's ruling on whether the state complies with the pretest…
Kmart Corp. v. LloydThe Board reversed, holding that claimant's medical evidence did not demonstrate that the compensable foot…