holding that the provision in ORS 36.425 that, after written notice of appeal and request for trial de novo of the action is filed, `trial de novo shall be held' is mandatory, even though the appealing party failed to participate in arbitration
Summary of this case from Richardson v. Fred MeyerJuly 20, 1999
holding that the provision in ORS 36.425 that, after written notice of appeal and request for trial de novo of the action is filed, `trial de novo shall be held' is mandatory, even though the appealing party failed to participate in arbitration
Summary of this case from Richardson v. Fred Meyerholding that the provision in ORS 36.425 that, after written notice of appeal and request for trial de novo of the action is filed, "trial de novo shall be held" is mandatory, even though the appealing party failed to participate in arbitration
Summary of this case from Foust v. American Standard InsuranceFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jul 20, 1999
Accordingly, we need not, and do not, consider whether a court may dismiss an adequately pleaded claim as a…
State v. M. UConsequently, unless there is some other legal principle that operates to save the appeal, we must dismiss…