From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 17, 2002
335 Or. 114 (Or. 2002)

Summary

construing "enhanced earning capacity" provision of former property division statute, ORS 107.105(f), and concluding that, although wife had contributed to husband's procurement of a degree in construction management, where there was no evidence that husband had ever been employed in that field or would make any economic use of that degree in the future, wife's contributions were not cognizable under the property division statute

Summary of this case from In the Matter of Marriage of Austin

Opinion

December 17, 2002


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 17, 2002
335 Or. 114 (Or. 2002)

construing "enhanced earning capacity" provision of former property division statute, ORS 107.105(f), and concluding that, although wife had contributed to husband's procurement of a degree in construction management, where there was no evidence that husband had ever been employed in that field or would make any economic use of that degree in the future, wife's contributions were not cognizable under the property division statute

Summary of this case from In the Matter of Marriage of Austin
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 17, 2002

Citations

335 Or. 114 (Or. 2002)
61 P.3d 255

Citing Cases

Turner v. State

(Emphases added.) We summarized the core principles applied in determining the existence of discretionary…

Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue v. Amerco Real Estate Co.

Having considered those contentions, we are not persuaded that the trial court erred in concluding that TVFR…