reasoning that cases interpreting the exclusion for intentional acts provide the appropriate measure for determining coverage of accidental injuries
Summary of this case from ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceApril 21, 1987.
reasoning that cases interpreting the exclusion for intentional acts provide the appropriate measure for determining coverage of accidental injuries
Summary of this case from ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurancereasoning that cases interpreting the exclusion for intentional acts provide the appropriate measure for determining coverage of accidental injuries
Summary of this case from Minnis v. Oregon Mutual Insurance CompanyFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Apr 21, 1987
Although the specific wording in the two statutes is not identical, the analysis of a violation under either…
State v. BostHere, the trial court found that the evidence did not support any exception. The dissent's reliance on State…