From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1996
324 Or. 78 (Or. 1996)

Summary

holding that breach of contract claim was subject to period of ultimate repose in ORS 12.115 where breach of contract allegations consisted only of previously alleged negligence and "evidence at trial was no different"

Summary of this case from Cannon v. Or. Dep't of Justice

Opinion

1996.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1996
324 Or. 78 (Or. 1996)

holding that breach of contract claim was subject to period of ultimate repose in ORS 12.115 where breach of contract allegations consisted only of previously alleged negligence and "evidence at trial was no different"

Summary of this case from Cannon v. Or. Dep't of Justice

holding that, even if admission of challenged evidence was erroneous, trial court's expressed reasoning for its verdict disclosed that any error was harmless

Summary of this case from State v. Lytsell

distinguishing Russell in rejecting claim of variance because ORS 167.325 does not classify animals by type but, instead, creates generic offense of animal neglect

Summary of this case from State v. Hansz
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1996

Citations

324 Or. 78 (Or. 1996)

Citing Cases

Voin v. Szabo

Argued and submitted November 15, 1995.Reversed and remanded March 20, 1996. Petition for review allowed…

Tiley and Tiley

Retirement benefits that accrue during marriage are assets that are subject to division as marital property.…