Summary
holding that the trial court plainly erred by imposing a gun-minimum sentence in violation of ORS 161.610 and exercising discretion to correct it
Summary of this case from State v. LairdOpinion
May 28, 1991.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
May 28, 1991
311 Or. 427 (Or. 1991)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
May 28, 1991
311 Or. 427 (Or. 1991)
holding that the trial court plainly erred by imposing a gun-minimum sentence in violation of ORS 161.610 and exercising discretion to correct it
Summary of this case from State v. Lairdholding that a jury conviction for solicitation to commit robbery necessarily included the requisite intent and elements for a conviction of attempted solicitation
Summary of this case from State v. Lopezfinding an informant credible "on the basis of previous information he had given to the police"
Summary of this case from State v. Marmonupholding a commitment based on "rapid" changes to eating and sleeping patterns, intense social isolation, and the fact that a past suicide attempt was accompanied by identical behavior
Summary of this case from In the Matter of Simonreversing a conviction for solicitation and remanding for entry of judgment for the lesser-included offense of attempted solicitation
Summary of this case from State v. Odnorozhenkoremanding with instructions to enter a judgment of conviction for attempted solicitation where evidence did not support conviction for solicitation to commit first-degree robbery
Summary of this case from State v. PittmanCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: May 28, 1991
Citations
311 Or. 427 (Or. 1991)
Citing Cases
State v. Lippert
The paperfold is a closed container that "announces its contents" and thus gives rise to probable cause to…
State v. JayneThe statute does not express a standard by which the imminence of the threat to life is to be measured. A…