From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 24, 1999
350 N.C. 592 (N.C. 1999)

Opinion


536 S.E.2d 627 (N.C. 1999) 350 N.C. 592 C.C. & J. ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE, Respondent, and Jackson Park/Woolsey Neighborhood Association. No. 184PA99. Supreme Court of North Carolina June 24, 1999

         Jim Siemens, Asheville, for Jackson Park/Woolsey Neighorhood Association.

         Stephen L. Barden, III, Asheville, for C.C. & J. Enterprises, Inc.

         Robert W. Oast, Jr., City Attorney, for City of Asheville.

         Prior report: 132 N.C.App. 550, 512 S.E.2d 766.

          ORDER

         Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (City of Asheville) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 1999."

         Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

         Respondent shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 24, 1999
350 N.C. 592 (N.C. 1999)
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 24, 1999

Citations

350 N.C. 592 (N.C. 1999)
350 N.C. 592

Citing Cases

Guthrie v. Conroy

For example, as this is not a statutory "sexual harassment case," plaintiff need not exhaust administrative…