From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1982
306 N.C. 386 (N.C. 1982)

Summary

according to N.C.R. Civ. P. 36(b), "`Any matter admitted under [Rule 36] is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission"

Summary of this case from Rahim v. Truck Air of the Carolinas

Opinion

1982


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1982
306 N.C. 386 (N.C. 1982)

according to N.C.R. Civ. P. 36(b), "`Any matter admitted under [Rule 36] is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission"

Summary of this case from Rahim v. Truck Air of the Carolinas
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1982

Citations

306 N.C. 386 (N.C. 1982)

Citing Cases

Ferrero Constr. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.

38, 46 (1983); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295, 307-308, 463 P.2d 297, 303 (1970); Neustadt v.…

Village of Pinehurst v. Regional Inv. of Moore

The right is perpetual in nature, and violates the reasonable time requirement. Coxe, at 134, 349 S.E.2d at…