From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1992
332 N.C. 482 (N.C. 1992)

Summary

affirming summary judgment against UDTPA counterclaim where bank's allegedly wrongful release of deed of trust constituted a breach of the note and loan agreement with the borrower

Summary of this case from Biosignia, Inc. v. Life Line Screening of Am., Ltd.

Opinion

1992


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1992
332 N.C. 482 (N.C. 1992)

affirming summary judgment against UDTPA counterclaim where bank's allegedly wrongful release of deed of trust constituted a breach of the note and loan agreement with the borrower

Summary of this case from Biosignia, Inc. v. Life Line Screening of Am., Ltd.

affirming summary judgment against UDTPA counterclaim where bank's allegedly wrongful release of deed of trust constituted a breach of the note and loan agreement with the borrower

Summary of this case from Biosignia, Inc. v. Life Line Screening of Am., Ltd.

affirming summary judgment against UDTPA counterclaim where bank's allegedly wrongful release of deed of trust constituted a breach of the note with borrower

Summary of this case from Stack v. Abbott Labs., Inc.
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1992

Citations

332 N.C. 482 (N.C. 1992)

Citing Cases

Ynovus Bank v. Karp

The Defendants have not identified any cases construing North Carolina law that recognize an…

Ynovus Bank v. Coleman

Under North Carolina law, it is well-established that “[a] fiduciary duty arises when there has been a…