Summary
holding that just because a witness is incompetent to testify does not deem their "out-of-court statements per se, or even presumptively, unreliable"
Summary of this case from State v. WagonerOpinion
1993
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
334 N.C. 625 (N.C. 1993)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
334 N.C. 625 (N.C. 1993)
holding that just because a witness is incompetent to testify does not deem their "out-of-court statements per se, or even presumptively, unreliable"
Summary of this case from State v. Wagonerfinding transport where defendant removed cocaine from a dwelling house and carried it to a car by which he left the premises with an undercover agent
Summary of this case from State v. DiazCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Citations
334 N.C. 625 (N.C. 1993)
Citing Cases
Williams v. State
, 831 S.W.2d 126, 128 (1992); People v. Mitchell, 829 P.2d 409, 412 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991); State v. Bruens,…
State v. YoungSecondly, Defendant argues that the statements made at daycare were inadmissible hearsay and do not fit…