concluding that "that part of the real property consisting of the unimproved property owned by defendant prior to marriage should be characterized as separate and that part of the property consisting of the additions, alterations and repairs provided during marriage should be considered marital in nature"
Summary of this case from Ross v. Ross1985
concluding that "that part of the real property consisting of the unimproved property owned by defendant prior to marriage should be characterized as separate and that part of the property consisting of the additions, alterations and repairs provided during marriage should be considered marital in nature"
Summary of this case from Ross v. RossFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1985
With respect to future pain and suffering and future medical expenses plaintiff did not object at trial to…
Vernon v. LoweHowever, the trial court in this case stated that plaintiff has "failed to prove by the greater weight of the…