From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 16, 1994
336 N.C. 609 (N.C. 1994)

Opinion


447 S.E.2d 402 (N.C. 1994) 336 N.C. 609 SAVE OUR RIVERS, INC. and Johnny R. Walker, Mary E. Walker, Helen C. Bayley, George C. Laneri, Elizabeth C. Laneri, Pat Thompson, Doug Thompson, Morris Bryson, Janice McClure, Alene Munger, Kim Thompson, Eunice Queen, John Northern, Joyce Northern, Nellie Carpenter, Christine Webb, Butch Deal, W.M. Moses, James Stephen Raby, Pearl Moses, Beta Tilson, Hallie Stiles, Jack McEachin, Claire McEachin, Joseph J. Johnson, Ruth C. Johnson, Robert Waters, James Bowser, Paul E. Geer, Florence Geer, Caroline Roney, Danny McDowell, Virgil L. Watkins, Rosalie K. Watkins, Randy Kushin, Robert J. Williams and Mary Edwards v. TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management, and Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary. No. 166PA94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 16, 1994

       John C. Hunter, Raleigh, for Town of Highlands.

       William Clark, Charlotte, for Save our Rivers, et al.

       Kathryn Jones Cooper, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., for NC Dept. of Environ., et al.

       Prior report: 113 N.C.App. 716, 440 S.E.2d 334.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Town of Highlands) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of June 1994."

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Town of Highlands) for Writ of Supersedeas and Motion for Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Defendant's Petition for Writ of Supersedeas is Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of June 1994."

       Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

       Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 16, 1994
336 N.C. 609 (N.C. 1994)
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 16, 1994

Citations

336 N.C. 609 (N.C. 1994)
336 N.C. 609

Citing Cases

In re Will of Lamparter

On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to…

In re Lamparter

On appeal of the superior court's judgment in the matter, however, this Court found that the superior court…