From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 3, 1994
335 N.C. 768 (N.C. 1994)

Opinion


442 S.E.2d 512 (N.C. 1994) 335 N.C. 768 CITY OF NEW BERN, a North Carolina municipal corporation v. The NEW BERN-CRAVEN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate under the laws of the State of North Carolina; The Trustees of Craven Community College, a body corporate under the laws of the State of North Carolina; Craven Regional Medical Authority, a public body and a body corporate and politic which has its principal office and place of business in the City of New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina; The County of Craven, a body corporate under the laws of the State of North Carolina; and Michael Easley, Attorney General, of the State of North Carolina. No. 5PA94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 3, 1994

       Kenneth R. Wooten, New Bern, Anne D. Edwards, New Bern, for Trustees of Craven Community College.

       A.D. Ward, New Bern, for City of New Bern.

       Fred Carmichael, Rudolph A. Ashton, III, New Bern, for Craven Regional Medical.

       David Henderson, New Bern, for New Bern-Craven Bd. of Educ.

       James R. Sugg, New Bern, for Craven County.

       Prior report: 113 N.C.App. 98, 437 S.E.2d 655.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by several Defendants in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 1994."

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by several Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 1994."

       Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 3, 1994
335 N.C. 768 (N.C. 1994)
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 3, 1994

Citations

335 N.C. 768 (N.C. 1994)
335 N.C. 768

Citing Cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Young

Jones v. Insurance Co., 270 N.C. 454, 155 S.E.2d 118 (1967). We are guided in our decision by the recent…

Smith v. Wisniewski

¶ 16 "[I]n cases where the language used is clear and unambiguous," this Court's "only duty is to determine…