From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
333 N.C. 166 (N.C. 1993)

Summary

holding that the plaintiff's reliance on the appearance of the land was unreasonable

Summary of this case from Driver v. Bagley

Opinion

1993


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
333 N.C. 166 (N.C. 1993)

holding that the plaintiff's reliance on the appearance of the land was unreasonable

Summary of this case from Driver v. Bagley

holding a commercial vendor owed no duty to disclose to a commercial vendee the presence of a landfill containing organic materials where vendee had full opportunity to make pertinent inquiries and failed to do so

Summary of this case from B F Slosman v. Sonopress, Inc.

stating that a plaintiff's reliance must be reasonable to prove fraud

Summary of this case from Helms v. Holland
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1993

Citations

333 N.C. 166 (N.C. 1993)

Citing Cases

State Properties v. Ray

Helms v. Holland, 124 N.C. App. 629, 634, 478 S.E.2d 513, 516 (1996) (citation omitted). Additionally,…

State ex Rel. Pilard v. Berninger

These arguments stem from the denial of defendants' motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence under…