concluding the plaintiff was precluded from arguing on appeal that the defendant should be estopped from attacking the validity of a divorce judgment where the record did not establish that the plaintiff had raised the issue of estoppel before the trial court
Summary of this case from Gunter v. Gunter1987
concluding the plaintiff was precluded from arguing on appeal that the defendant should be estopped from attacking the validity of a divorce judgment where the record did not establish that the plaintiff had raised the issue of estoppel before the trial court
Summary of this case from Gunter v. GunterFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1987
Rule 60(b)(4) provides movants relief from orders that are void for lack of jurisdiction. N.C. Gen. Stat. §…
Wells v. WellsAccordingly, and particularly in view of the lack of notice and other circumstances discussed above, we…