Summary
holding that a summary judgment order validating a separation agreement affected equitable distribution as a substantial right and thus was proper for interlocutory review
Summary of this case from Johnson v. JohnsonOpinion
1985
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1985
313 N.C. 597 (N.C. 1985)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1985
313 N.C. 597 (N.C. 1985)
holding that a summary judgment order validating a separation agreement affected equitable distribution as a substantial right and thus was proper for interlocutory review
Summary of this case from Johnson v. JohnsonCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1985
Citations
313 N.C. 597 (N.C. 1985)
Citing Cases
Westpoint Stevens, Inc. v. Panda-Rosemary Corp.
{9} North Carolina courts recognize the use of partial summary judgment under Rule 56(d) of the North…
West Durham v. MeadowsPursuant to this doctrine, a previously existing materialmen's lien would be subordinated to the lien of the…