Summary
holding that if an action is discontinued, the trial court is required to follow Rule 4 to determine the date the action commenced
Summary of this case from Bryson v. CortOpinion
1979
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1979
297 N.C. 610 (N.C. 1979)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1979
297 N.C. 610 (N.C. 1979)
holding that if an action is discontinued, the trial court is required to follow Rule 4 to determine the date the action commenced
Summary of this case from Bryson v. CortCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1979
Citations
297 N.C. 610 (N.C. 1979)
Citing Cases
Spartan Leasing v. Pollard
Even assuming, arguendo, that Warren misrepresented the guaranty to be an agreement for forwarding payments,…
Reese v. BarbeeA summons issued more than ninety days after the issuance or endorsement of the previous summons does not…