Summary
noting testimony that a co-broker was simply "someone that is working with another broker"
Summary of this case from Maxwell v. Michael P. Doyle, Inc.Opinion
1976
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1976
291 N.C. 323 (N.C. 1976)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1976
291 N.C. 323 (N.C. 1976)
noting testimony that a co-broker was simply "someone that is working with another broker"
Summary of this case from Maxwell v. Michael P. Doyle, Inc.Case details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1976
Citations
291 N.C. 323 (N.C. 1976)
Citing Cases
Zanone v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.
Although the existence of accord and satisfaction is generally a question of fact, "where the only reasonable…
Spencer v. ByrdTo be held individually liable for an act, a government official must be found to have acted corruptly,…