Summary
holding the defendants' reliance unreasonable as a matter of law when the defendants signed a guaranty that expressly contradicted the creditor's assurance
Summary of this case from Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Opinion
1984
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1984
312 N.C. 493 (N.C. 1984)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1984
312 N.C. 493 (N.C. 1984)
holding the defendants' reliance unreasonable as a matter of law when the defendants signed a guaranty that expressly contradicted the creditor's assurance
Summary of this case from Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.rejecting petitioners' argument that the annexation violated N.C.G.S. 160A-47 (3)a because response times to fires would be longer in the newly annexed areas than in the rest of the city
Summary of this case from Matheson v. City of AshevilleCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1984
Citations
312 N.C. 493 (N.C. 1984)
Citing Cases
Knight v. City of Wilmington
We disagree. Several plans have been approved by appellate courts in which the plans made no provisions for…
Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.A debtor who, on the one hand, acknowledges his debt obligations and waives any defenses against that…