From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
334 N.C. 619 (N.C. 1993)

Summary

stating that causation is a common element necessary in each of plaintiffs' claims in suit alleging violation of OPHSCA, negligence, nuisance and trespass arising out of contamination of plaintiffs' wells

Summary of this case from James v. Clark

Opinion

1993


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
334 N.C. 619 (N.C. 1993)

stating that causation is a common element necessary in each of plaintiffs' claims in suit alleging violation of OPHSCA, negligence, nuisance and trespass arising out of contamination of plaintiffs' wells

Summary of this case from James v. Clark
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1993

Citations

334 N.C. 619 (N.C. 1993)

Citing Cases

Affiliated Const. Trades v. Regional Jail

It is ordinarily held that the Freedom of Information Acts impose no duty upon an agency to "create" a public…

Williams v. City of Durham

In essence, the City argues violation of the foregoing Code section constitutes negligence per se. We agree…