finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to sever because his "only assertion of possible prejudice is that he might have elected to testify in one of the cases and not in the others"
Summary of this case from State v. Knight1978
finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to sever because his "only assertion of possible prejudice is that he might have elected to testify in one of the cases and not in the others"
Summary of this case from State v. KnightFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1978
A defendant fails to show abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in joining two offenses for…
State v. SheetzDefendant's argument that the evidence of incendiary origin is incompetent is meritless. An expert in arson…