Summary
holding that the trial court erred by admitting irrelevant evidence that the defendant who was charged with cocaine trafficking had a stamp on his passport indicating that he had visited Colombia approximately two months before his arrest, as it tended to mislead the jury as to the level of his involvement in drug trafficking, but nevertheless affirming his conviction because the properly admitted evidence against him was sufficiently overwhelming to make it "unlikely that a different result would have occurred at trial but for the introduction of the passport."
Summary of this case from State v. McKnightOpinion
1996