From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 5, 1996
345 N.C. 180 (N.C. 1996)

Opinion


478 S.E.2d 788 (N.C. 1996) 345 N.C. 180 Fred R. SEUFERT and Dorothy M. Seufert, his wife; Arthur J. Passman, his wife; James A. Moncure and Jane B. Moncure, his wife; William L. Reaves, and Sue C. Reaves, his wife; Leo D. Burrell and Mollie S. Burrell, his wife; Robert E. Strauss and Doris P. Strauss, his wife; William M. Chriscoe and Mary L. Chriscoe, his wife; Richard Steiner and Dorothy L. Steiner, his wife; and George E. Breslin and Susanna M. Breslin, his wife v. SEVEN LAKES DEVELOPMENT CO. No. 346PA96. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 5, 1996

       E.D. Gaskins, Jr., C. Amanda Martin, Raleigh, for Seven Lakes.

       Richard J. Costanza, Southern Pines, for Seufert et al.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of December 1996."

       Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

       Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 5, 1996
345 N.C. 180 (N.C. 1996)
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 5, 1996

Citations

345 N.C. 180 (N.C. 1996)
345 N.C. 180

Citing Cases

Wright v. Anderson

1996). When determining the validity of the Maryland Order, according to the guidelines set forth in FFCCSOA,…

Wilson Cty. v. Egbert

Id., Pub.L. No. 103-383(2)(b), 108 Stat. 4063 (codified as amended at 28 U.S.C. § 1738B (1994)). The FFCCSOA…