From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Certiorari Granted

Supreme Court of Utah
Jan 1, 1998
982 P.2d 87 (Utah 1998)

Summary

finding that the plaintiff had not established a prima facie case of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy because none of the statutes cited to the court expressed a relevant clear and substantial public policy

Summary of this case from Barela v. C.R. England Sons, Inc.

Opinion

1998/1999


Docket Lower Court Title Number Date Citation or Number

Tingey v. Christensen .................. 980149 6/26/98 961791-CA

C.F. v. D.D. ........................... 980053 5/11/98 971218-CA

Pledger v. Cigna Healthplan ............ 980133 8/11/98 971527-CA

State v. Layman ........................ 980150 8/11/98 953 P.2d 782

Capitol Assests v. Lindsay ............. 980222 8/11/98 956 P.2d 1090

Bd. Of Equaliz'n v. Stichting .......... 980013 8/11/98 943 P.2d 238

Reese v. Reese ......................... 980004 8/11/98 961749-CA

Longley v. Leucadia Financial .......... 981428 10/3/98 960 P.2d 907

State v. Finlayson ..................... 980279 10/10/98 956 P.2d 283

State v. Adams ......................... 980261 10/30/98 955 P.2d 781

Griffith v. Griffith ................... 981462 10/30/98 959 P.2d 1015

SLC v. Johnson ......................... 981393 11/19/98 959 P.2d 1022

Ortega v. Meadow Valley Const. ......... 981644 1/13/99 971405-CA

Burgess v. Siaperas Sand Gravel ...... 981645 1/13/99 965 P.2d 583

State v. Wells ......................... 980124 2/1/99 971725-CA

Summit Co. v. Harper ................... 981493 2/11/99 963 P.2d 768

Utelite v. Harper ...................... 981495 2/11/99 963 P.2d 768

Sittner v. Schriever ................... 981776 2/23/99 970759-CA

Rackley v. Fairview Care Centers ....... 990044 4/19/99 970 P.2d 277

Stouffer Food Corp. v. Utah Labor Commission ............................. 990050 4/19/99 970 P.2d 272

M.W. v. L.A.W. ......................... 990137 5/18/99 970 P.2d 284

L.A.W. v. State ........................ 990140 5/18/99 970 P.2d 284

Lysenko v. Sawaya ...................... 990240 5/20/99 973 P.2d 445

Esquivel v. Redd Roofing ............... 990250 6/21/99 973 P.2d 440

State v. Visser ........................ 990257 6/3/99 973 P.2d 998

Frank v. Holt .......................... 980070 5/27/98 960732-CA

Zivkovic v. Warden ..................... 980101 6/5/98 970270-CA

Jenkins v. Cooper ...................... 980108 6/5/98 970498-CA

State v. Dillenbeck .................... 980134 5/27/98 960486-CA

Romero v. Hansen ....................... 980160 6/17/98 970334-CA

Sagewood Productions v. Brimley ........ 980100 5/11/99 971157-CA

State v. Plumb ......................... 980119 5/11/98 971428-CA

State v. Johnson ....................... 980069 5/22/98 951531-CA

Headley v. Galetka ..................... 980179 6/24/98 971614-CA

Brooks v. Warden ....................... 980118 6/24/98 971476-CA Draper v. State ........................ 980260 8/11/98 971719-CA

Cederlof v. Cederlof ................... 980212 8/11/98 971745-CA

Sandy City Bd. Of Adjustment v. Brown ............................... 980198 8/11/98 957 P.2d 207

Hulet v. Hulet ......................... 980252 8/18/98 981019-CA

State v. Gallaher ...................... 980227 9/3/98 961618-CA

W.J.M. Properties v. Cummings .......... 980303 9/3/98 971550-CA

Matthews v. Warden ..................... 980258 9/3/98 958 P.2d 949

State v. Friis ......................... 980259 9/4/98 961445-CA

Smith v. Stewart ....................... 980093 9/25/98 971524-CA

Drazich v. Lasson ...................... 980306 10/6/98 964 P.2d 324

Lytle v. Lytle ......................... 980307 10/6/98 971358-CA

State v. Bake .......................... 980183 10/10/98 961551-CA

Cox v. Ut. State Indust. Com'n. ....... 981422 10/30/98 971721-CA

Turner v. Dept. of Workforce Services .. 981460 11/2/98 971734-CA

State v. Holden ........................ 981491 11/19/98 964 P.2d 318

Ricci v. Schoultz M.D. ................. 981494 11/19/98 963 P.2d 784

Trash v. Trash ......................... 981394 11/19/98 971204-CA

Weinstein v. Sinclair Oil Corp. ........ 981464 11/19/98 971104-CA

Larsen v. Ohlanderq .................... 981429 11/19/98 981054-CA

Geddes v. Guyon ........................ 981543 11/19/98 971391-CA

Stokes v. Pulley ....................... 981505 12/7/98 961650-CA

State v. Baker ......................... 981602 12/7/98 963 P.2d 801

State v. Flores ........................ 981492 12/23/98 981278-CA

Vonwald v. Plumb ....................... 981630 12/23/98 981278-CA

State v. Straley ....................... 981633 1/13/99 971447-CA

Faux v. Workforce Services ............. 981634 1/13/99 981261-CA

Julian v. Peterson ..................... 981735 1/13/99 966 P.2d 878

State v. Bredehoft ..................... 981695 1/13/99 966 P.2d 285

State v. York .......................... 981727 1/13/99 981257-CA

Verikokidis v. State ................... 981664 1/13/99 980204-CA

Weyland v. Miller ...................... 981678 1/13/99 971661-CA

State v. Labrum ........................ 981566 1/13/99 959 P.2d 120

State V. Breitweiser ................... 981789 2/11/99 971596-CA

James v. Warden ........................ 981698 2/17/99 961767-CA

Childs v. Childs ....................... 981807 2/17/99 967 P.2d 942

Atcitty v. San Juan Bd. Of Education ... 981799 2/17/99 967 P.2d 1261

C.P. v. Ut. Office of Crime Victims .... 981833 2/17/99 966 P.2d 1226

State v. Deherrera ..................... 981759 2/23/99 965 P.2d 501

Turner v. Turner ....................... 990009 3/8/99 971615-CA

Pendergrass v. Warden .................. 981863 3/8/99 981210-CA

Durborow v. IHC Hospitals, Inc. ........ 981849 3/8/99 970309-CA

State v. Ellignsworth .................. 981826 4/8/99 966 P.2d 1220

Cooper v. Jenkins ...................... 981832 4/8/99 980219-CA

Buddensick v. Stateline Hotel, Inc. .... 990063 4/13/99 972 P.2d 928

Mast v. Overson ........................ 990095 4/28/99 971 P.2d 928

State v. Deiter ........................ 990102 4/8/99 971555-CA

D.C. v. State .......................... 990108 4/8/99 963 P.2d 761

B.L.B. v. State ........................ 990109 4/19/99 971739-CA

Dept. of Public Safety v. Mair ......... 990116 4/28/99 981523-CA

State v. Davis ......................... 990119 4/28/99 965 P.2d 525 Hickman v. Workforce Services .......... 990124 4/28/99 981656-CA

Smith v. Tyler ......................... 990139 4/28/99 971176-CA

ELM, Inc. v. M.T. Enterprises, Inc. .... 990149 4/28/99 968 P.2d 861

Zions First Nat. v. First Sec. Financial .............................. 990155 6/21/99 973 P.2d 992

Harrington Properties v. Peterson ...... 990196 4/28/99 973 P.2d 1004

State v. Thomas ........................ 990053 6/21/99 961170-CA

Salt Lake City v. Anderson ............. 990184 6/3/99 981507-CA

Straley v. Board of Pardons ............ 990199 6/3/99 990042-CA

Marsh v. Marsh ......................... 990241 6/3/99 973 P.2d 988

Moon v. Moon ........................... 990242 6/21/99 973 P.2d 431

State v. Ivie .......................... 990243 6/3/99 971656-CA

Schwinn v. Labor Com'n ................. 990273 6/21/99 981319-CA

Cassidy v. Salt Lake County Fire Civil Service ..................... 990287 6/21/99 976 P.2d 607

C.S. v. State .......................... 990401 6/23/99 990162-CA


Summaries of

Petitions for Certiorari Granted

Supreme Court of Utah
Jan 1, 1998
982 P.2d 87 (Utah 1998)

finding that the plaintiff had not established a prima facie case of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy because none of the statutes cited to the court expressed a relevant clear and substantial public policy

Summary of this case from Barela v. C.R. England Sons, Inc.
Case details for

Petitions for Certiorari Granted

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIORARI GRANTED

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Jan 1, 1998

Citations

982 P.2d 87 (Utah 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. Visser

In Visser I, we held that the trial court exceeded its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a new…

State v. Tarnawiecki

While "a rigid colloquy or rote recitation of the elements of Rule 11 is not required, . . . Rule 11(e)…