finding that a judge may not "abdicate his decision-making responsibility and adjudicate the matter solely based on the results of a test administered by . . . [an] expert"
Summary of this case from N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. L.S. (In re Guardianship Z.A.S.)2003
finding that a judge may not "abdicate his decision-making responsibility and adjudicate the matter solely based on the results of a test administered by . . . [an] expert"
Summary of this case from N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. L.S. (In re Guardianship Z.A.S.)Full title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Jan 1, 2003
Possessing a financial interest in the outcome of the litigation is ordinarily sufficient to confer standing.…
Thomas & Cheryl Koziol, Inc. v. Lasalle Nat'l BankKoziol also challenges the dismissal of its claim in count four that it was a third-party beneficiary of the…