holding that when an insurance policy is unambiguous, the court must enforce it and should not consider the probable intent and reasonable expectations of the parties
Summary of this case from G-I Holdings v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company2000
holding that when an insurance policy is unambiguous, the court must enforce it and should not consider the probable intent and reasonable expectations of the parties
Summary of this case from G-I Holdings v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyFull title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
"A statute must clearly and irremediably violate[] the ban on special legislation to be invalidated." City of…
Villa Enterprises v. Federal Ins. Co.In fact, the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify; if there are multiple claims alleged, only…