finding that trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying "defendant's application to proceed pro se [when it] was made after the jury was selected and immediately before opening statements"
Summary of this case from State v. Harris2001
finding that trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying "defendant's application to proceed pro se [when it] was made after the jury was selected and immediately before opening statements"
Summary of this case from State v. Harrisstating that equitable tolling would apply to CEPA claim only if "plaintiff lacked vital information which was withheld by defendant"
Summary of this case from Wunder v. Katherine Gibbs SchoolFull title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Jan 1, 2001
Under Third Circuit and New Jersey law, equitable tolling only applies in employment discrimination cases…
Worley v. Worley (In re Worley)Although an expert witness is generally confined to the opinions contained in his or her report provided in…