holding that a party is not entitled to reconsideration based on new or additional information if that information was available at the time of trial
Summary of this case from N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. J.O. (In re CO.)2002
holding that a party is not entitled to reconsideration based on new or additional information if that information was available at the time of trial
Summary of this case from N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. J.O. (In re CO.)recognizing that "children are entitled to the benefit of financial advantages available to them"
Summary of this case from Bond v. Bondnoting in dicta that in cases where "a motion for reconsideration . . . implicate the substantive issues in the case and the basis for the motion judge's ruling on the [underlying judgment or order is] the same . . . an appeal solely from . . . the denial of reconsideration may be sufficient for an appellate review of the merits of the case, particularly where those issues are raised in the CIS."
Summary of this case from Kaplan v. Kaplanrefusing to consider arguments about the grant of summary judgment on an appeal where plaintiff identified only the denial of his motion for reconsideration in his notice of appeal
Summary of this case from Basile v. Passaic Valley Sewerage Comm'nnoting in dicta that in cases where "a motion for reconsideration . . . implicate the substantive issues in the case and the basis for the motion judge's ruling on the [underlying judgment or order is] the same an appeal solely from . . . the denial of reconsideration may be sufficient for an appellate review of the merits of the case, particularly where those issues are raised in the CIS"
Summary of this case from Sobel v. Maguirenoting reconsideration is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court
Summary of this case from Cohen v. Pagenoting that "reconsideration should be used only for those cases which fall into that narrow corridor in which either ( l) the Court has expressed its decision based upon a palpably incorrect or irrational basis, or it is obvious that the Court either did not consider, or failed to appreciate the significance of probative, competent evidence"
Summary of this case from Borough of Glassboro v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 108Full title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Jan 1, 2002
Fusco v. Bd. of Educ., 349 N.J. Super. 455, 462 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 174 N.J. 544 (2002); see also R.…
Zubrycky v. ASA Apple, Inc.The unemployment benefit law does not require that a plaintiff be either fired or constructively discharged…