From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 1999
739 A.2d 539 (Pa. 1999)

Summary

holding that trial court did not err in denying petition to strike or open default judgment where question of employer's liability for claimant's benefits was still pending on employer's termination petition, due to validity of WCJ's original award of benefits under which employer was required to pay, but failed to do so

Summary of this case from Clayton v. City of Philadelphia

Opinion

June 1999.


Fiore Auto Services v. Com., Dept. of Transp., Bureau of Motor Vehicles .............. 6/15/99 0005 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., W.D. 727 A.2d 650 (1999) Gall v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Upper Milford Tp .................. 6/8/99 197 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., M.D. 723 A.2d 758 (1999)

Plumbing v. Com. ............. 6/21/99 189 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., M.D. 728 A.2d 1056 (1999)

Gregory v. W.C.A.B. (Cummins Diesel Engines, Inc.) .............. 5/27/99 0720 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., W.D. 720 A.2d 171 (1998)

Homer v. C.S. Myers Sons, Inc. .......... 6/3/99 1131 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., M.D. 721 A.2d 394 (1998)

Humberson v. W.C.A.B. (Darr Repair and Newborn Enterprises) ................ 6/17/99 0057 Denied No. 1763 C.D, W.D. 1998 (1999)

Johnson v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review ............... 6/10/99 015 Denied No. 3069 C.D. E.D. 1997 (1999)

Katz v. Lamb ................. 6/1/99 672 Granted Pa.Cmwlth., E.D. (0021 734 A.2d 444 (1998) E.D. 1999)

Matthews v. W.C.A.B. (Conoco, Inc.); Conoco, Inc., In re ................. 6/1/99 777 Denied No. 3429 C.D. W.D. 1997 (1998)


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 1999
739 A.2d 539 (Pa. 1999)

holding that trial court did not err in denying petition to strike or open default judgment where question of employer's liability for claimant's benefits was still pending on employer's termination petition, due to validity of WCJ's original award of benefits under which employer was required to pay, but failed to do so

Summary of this case from Clayton v. City of Philadelphia

holding that trial court did not err in denying petition to strike or open default judgment where question of employer's liability for claimant's benefits was still pending on employer's termination petition, due to validity of WCJ's original award of benefits under which employer was required to pay, but failed to do so

Summary of this case from Campagna v. Brandon Knitwear, Inc.
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 1, 1999

Citations

739 A.2d 539 (Pa. 1999)
739 A.2d 539

Citing Cases

Therres v. Zoning Hearing Board

Finally, Appellants argue that the Zoning Hearing Board abused its discretion by: (a) failing to require…

Snizaski v. W.C.A.B

Claimant further notes that previous decisions of the Commonwealth Court interpreting the Act have recognized…