From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 1, 1997
698 A.2d 63 (Pa. 1997)

Summary

holding that an ordinance prohibiting "excessive vegetation," which was defined as "any grass, weeds, bushes, brush, saplings or similar vegetation exceeding six inches in height except such as are planted for useful or ornamental purposes," was a valid exercise of police powers and was not unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from City of Montgomery v. Norman

Opinion

May-July 1997.


Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation _____________________ _________ _________ ___________ ____________________

Brown v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections ... 7/18/97 027 Denied No. 3207 C.D. M.D. 1996 (1997) Cogan v. County of Beaver; County Comrs' Ass'n of Pennsylvania, Petition of ...... 7/10/97 194 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., W.D. 690 A.2d 763 (1997)

Com. v. Mack ....... 5/30/97 0010 Denied Pa.Cmwlth; W.D. 697 A.2d 276 (1997)

Com. v. Siemel ..... 7/11/97 0055 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., M.D. 686 A.2d 899 (1997)

Conner v. Fairview Tp. .............. 6/30/97 14 W.D. Denied No. 2418 C.D. (1997) 1996

Creasy v. W.C.A.B. (T J Meats) .... 7/22/97 177 Denied No. 2119 C.D. M.D. 1996 (1997)

Dixon v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole ........... 6/25/97 0651 Denied No. 1033 C.D. E.D. 1995 (1996)

Gelb v. Clarks Green Borough Council; Orloski, Petition of ............... 7/25/97 79 M.D. Denied No. 1367 C.D. (1997) 1996

Inverso v. PA Public Utility Comm'n ... 6/13/97 0788 Denied No. 1449 C.D. E.D. 1995 (1996)

Kaehly v. City of Pittsburgh ....... 5/21/97 0042 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., W.D. 687 A.2d 41 (1997)

Michael J. Lunardini, Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Bussey); Bussey, Petition of: .............. 6/10/97 0164 Denied No. 230 C.D. 1996 W.D. (1997)


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 1, 1997
698 A.2d 63 (Pa. 1997)

holding that an ordinance prohibiting "excessive vegetation," which was defined as "any grass, weeds, bushes, brush, saplings or similar vegetation exceeding six inches in height except such as are planted for useful or ornamental purposes," was a valid exercise of police powers and was not unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from City of Montgomery v. Norman
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 1, 1997

Citations

698 A.2d 63 (Pa. 1997)
698 A.2d 63

Citing Cases

Larock v. Sugarloaf Tp. Zon. Hearing Bd.

The Official Note to Rule 341 explains that an order denying a petitioner the right to intervene no longer…

City of Montgomery v. Norman

Furthermore, by providing a specific height at which a plant may be declared a nuisance, the ordinance gives…