finding that defendant possessed cocaine with intent to deliver was sufficiently supported where state trooper testified that the pound of cocaine seized from defendant and his two companions was more than one would possess for purely personal consumption
Summary of this case from Com. v. Little1994
finding that defendant possessed cocaine with intent to deliver was sufficiently supported where state trooper testified that the pound of cocaine seized from defendant and his two companions was more than one would possess for purely personal consumption
Summary of this case from Com. v. Littlefinding that defendant possessed cocaine with intent to deliver was sufficiently supported by expert testimony that the pound of cocaine seized from defendant and his two companions was more than one would possess for purely personal consumption
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. DrummondFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
In attempting to ascertain the meaning of a statute, we must consider the intent of the legislature and…
In re LarsenAbsent any manifest intention of the General Assembly that the general provision of the Crimes Code should…