Summary
stating "Deviate sexual intercourse is considered to have occurred if one's mouth or tongue penetrates the vaginal area of another"
Summary of this case from Com. v. SnyderOpinion
1997
stating "Deviate sexual intercourse is considered to have occurred if one's mouth or tongue penetrates the vaginal area of another"
Summary of this case from Com. v. Snyder1997
stating "Deviate sexual intercourse is considered to have occurred if one's mouth or tongue penetrates the vaginal area of another"
Summary of this case from Com. v. Snyderstating "Deviate sexual intercourse is considered to have occurred if one's mouth or tongue penetrates the vaginal area of another"
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Clemmerstating "Deviate sexual intercourse is considered to have occurred if one's mouth or tongue penetrates the vaginal area of another"
Summary of this case from Com. v. Wilsonstating "Deviate sexual intercourse is considered to have occurred if one's mouth or tongue penetrates the vaginal area of another"
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. L.NFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Where a special account exists, the bank is generally serving as a bailee or a trustee. See Royal Bank of…
Foster v. Progress Federal Sav. and Loanhis case — such as the clerical errors of Progress' staff and its contact with Kohlmeyer and Selikoff —…