recognizing that the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions compel the trial court to impose a minimum period of confinement but permit the courts, within their discretion, to impose more than the mandatory minimum sentence
Summary of this case from Com. v. Eicher1991
recognizing that the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions compel the trial court to impose a minimum period of confinement but permit the courts, within their discretion, to impose more than the mandatory minimum sentence
Summary of this case from Com. v. EicherFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
Commonwealth v. One 1985 Dark BlueMercedes, 391 Pa. Super. 507, 571 A.2d 482 (1990), alloc. denied 526 Pa.…
Welsh v. City of PhiladelphiaSee City of Philadelphia v. Patton, 148 Pa. Commw. 141, 609 A.2d 903 (1992). In City of Philadelphia v. Gray,…