From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 1, 1994
641 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1994)

Summary

holding that error was harmless where erroneously admitted evidence was substantially similar to properly introduced eyewitness testimony

Summary of this case from Com. v. Carter

Opinion

February 1994.


Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation ______________________ _______ _________ ___________ ___________________

Com. v. Johnson ..... 3/9/94 0606 Denied 432 Pa. Super. 686, W.D. 635 A.2d 204 (1993)

See No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1.

Com. v. Land ....... 2/11/94 0701 Denied 432 Pa. Super. 687, E.D. 635 A.2d 204 (1993)

Justice Ronald D. CASTILLE did not participate. See No. 127 Administration Docket No. 1.

Com. v. Leefn__ ........ 2/11/94 0276 Denied 429 Pa. Super. 647, E.D. 628 A.2d 452 (1993)

Com. v. Leefn_ ......... 2/15/94 0595 Denied 432 Pa. Super. 687, E.D. 635 A.2d 204 (1993)

Com. v. Linnenfn_ ...... 3/7/94 0627 Denied 432 Pa. Super. 687, W.D. 635 A.2d 204 (1993)

Com. v. MacArthurfn__ .. 2/11/94 0646 Denied 427 Pa. Super. 409, E.D. 629 A.2d 166 (1993)

Com. v. Mancefn_ ....... 2/28/94 0151 Granted 422 Pa. Super. 584, W.D. (0012 W.D. 619 A.2d 1378 (1993) 1994)

Com. v. Mantinez ..... 2/11/94 0050 Denied No. 2985 E.D. Philadelphia 1991 (1993)

Com. v. Martinezfn__ ... 2/11/94 0248 Denied 429 Pa. Super. 648, E.D. 628 A.2d 453 (1993)

Com. v. Matthewsfn__ ... 2/14/94 0438 Denied 431 Pa. Super. 620, E.D. 631 A.2d 215 (1993) Com. v. Ngowfn_ ........ 3/10/94 0182 Granted 422 Pa. Super. 578, E.D. (0019 E.D. 619 A.2d 1374 (1993) 1994)

Com. v. O'Hanlonfn_ .... 3/7/94 0805 Granted 432 Pa. Super. 689, E.D. (17 E.D. 635 A.2d 206 (1993) 1994)

Com. v. Pricefn_ ....... 2/23/94 0379 Denied 431 Pa. Super. 642, W.D. 631 A.2d 1371 (1993)

Com. v. Simmonsfn_ ..... 2/23/94 395 W.D. Denied 431 Pa. Super. 643, (1993) 631 A.2d 1372

Com. v. Stinsonfn__ .... 2/11/94 0594 Denied 427 Pa. Super. 289, E.D. 628 A.2d 1165 (1993)


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 1, 1994
641 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1994)

holding that error was harmless where erroneously admitted evidence was substantially similar to properly introduced eyewitness testimony

Summary of this case from Com. v. Carter
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 1, 1994

Citations

641 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1994)
641 A.2d 306

Citing Cases

Com. v. Smith

Id. at 589 n. 4, 614 A.2d at 687 n. 4. The principles enunciated in Commonwealth v. Bazemore, supra, were…

Com. v. May

This testimony was merely cumulative of Ms. DeHaven's testimony with respect to the letters she received, and…