Summary
Finding no controlling Pennsylvania authority that mandates summary judgment whenever the plaintiff fails to preserve the defective product.
Summary of this case from Meadows v. Anchor Longwall Rebuild, Inc.Opinion
1998
Finding no controlling Pennsylvania authority that mandates summary judgment whenever the plaintiff fails to preserve the defective product.
Summary of this case from Meadows v. Anchor Longwall Rebuild, Inc.1998
Finding no controlling Pennsylvania authority that mandates summary judgment whenever the plaintiff fails to preserve the defective product.
Summary of this case from Meadows v. Anchor Longwall Rebuild, Inc.Full title:PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
See Schultz v. Barko Hydraulics, Inc., 832 F. Supp. 142, 145 (W.D. Pa. 1993) (Rejecting defendant's argument…
Harsh v. PetrollIn order for Plaintiffs to prove that the Lumina was improperly manufactured, they must prove that the…