From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Payton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 8, 2013
Case No. 10-14403 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 10-14403

02-08-2013

RONNIE PETERSON , Plaintiff, v. DEYON PAYTON, ET AL., Defendants.


SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW


MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION [33]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF

DEFAULT JUDGMENT [30]; AND ASSESSING RULE 37 SANCTIONS AGAINST

DEFENDANT

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Devon Payton [30], filed on October 16, 2012. On November 28, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation [33] recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion [30] and assess Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 37 sanctions against Defendant Payton in the amount of $250.00.

Defendant Payton has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation [33]. The Court has reviewed the record in this case.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to for Entry of Default Judgment Against Devon Payton [30] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Payton pay Plaintiff's counsel $250.00 as a Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 37 sanction.

SO ORDERED.

________________________

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Peterson v. Payton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 8, 2013
Case No. 10-14403 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Peterson v. Payton

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE PETERSON , Plaintiff, v. DEYON PAYTON, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

Case No. 10-14403 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Kendell v. Shanklin

But Plaintiff's request that the Court enter default judgment in her favor is a "draconian sanction," issued…