From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 15, 2013
Case No. 11-15154 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 11-15154

11-15-2013

DENARD PETERSON Plaintiff, v. ERIC HALL, Defendant.


Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff


OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [dkt 27], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt 25] and dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. No objections were filed to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, and the time period in which to do so has elapsed. See Fed. R. Civ. P 72(b)(2).

The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file and the Report and Recommendation. As a result of that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and enters it as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt 25] is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence P. Zatkoff

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Peterson v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 15, 2013
Case No. 11-15154 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Peterson v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:DENARD PETERSON Plaintiff, v. ERIC HALL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2013

Citations

Case No. 11-15154 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

Konica Minolta Bus. Sols., U.S.A., Inc. v. Lowery Corp.

he other instances of breach are unavailing; they are conclusory and fail to acknowledge or contradict the…